| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • Work with all your cloud files (Drive, Dropbox, and Slack and Gmail attachments) and documents (Google Docs, Sheets, and Notion) in one place. Try Dokkio (from the makers of PBworks) for free. Now available on the web, Mac, Windows, and as a Chrome extension!

View
 

P4 Resource Availability and Funding Models

Page history last edited by Chris Jones 11 years, 9 months ago

 

P4 Resource Availability and Funding Models

 

Framing of this issue:

Traditional funding model is to "allocate slices of the pie". What are alternative funding models to consider.

 

Problem Dimensions (ecosystem domain & boundaries):

Look at Charter Schools as an alternative model

Look at State Funding sources to determine alternatives (see also, "P2 Compensation").

Look at private investor models on a broader scale.

Look at Federal government role.

What data can we review to drive this analysis?

 

Who Has the Problem (supervising jurisdictions & implementation focus):

State Departments of Education  

 

A. Problem Statement:

  •  

 

B. Process Description (if applicable):

  •  

 

C. Actors & Behaviors (desired, undesired):

  • Federal Government (role TBD)
  • State Legislators (determine funding sources, eg., tax base; lottery)
  • Administration (allocate from available funds)
  • Taxpayers (ultimate funding source)

 

D. Process Model (picture(s) & flow(s) as needed):

  • diagrams of flow that may be relevant to understanding or solutions for this issue? 

 

E. Process Rules:

  • what are constraints, actual or implied? 

 

F. Outcomes (desired, undesired):

  • Are there stakeholders seeking to "change the game" in terms of available infrastructure, i.e., not willing to accept the 'status quo' of the existing model?

 

G. External Context: 

 

Other sources or references relative to this topic

  •  

 

 

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.